Just days before their annual conference in Sitges, Spain, the Bilderberg group appears to have suffered a major setback in Germany, the eurozone’s largest economy.

The Bilderbergs have lost a key figure at the top of Germany’s political power structure after the sudden resignation of President Horst Koehler that has sent shockwaves throughout the country, fuelled dissatisfaction with the political class, and that could signal the end of the centre-right coalition government.

Chancellor Angela Merkel is pushing through the Bilderberg agenda of looting tax payers under the pretext of a eurozone bailout, and of also paving the way for the initiation of a third world war as part of a larger plan for the establishment of global government.

But Koehler is not the only high-profile Bilderberger in Germany to have stepped down recently.

Last Tuesday, Roland Koch, premier of the German state of Hesse, announced his sudden resignation.

Koch attended the Bilderberg meeting in Athens last year, and was widely believed by insiders to be preparing to take over from Merkel.

Koch’s successor for his job in Hesse also resigned, tearing a hole in the shadowy network that Bilderberg’s use to promote the junior ranks to positions of power in Germany.

But the resignation of the consummate Bilderberg insider and former IMF director Horst Koehler will weaken the Merkel government’s grip on power far more.

Koehler's resignation could not have come at a worse time for Merkel’s government, which is trying to push through brutal budget cuts in welfare as well as big tax hikes in order to pay for the gigantic bank bailouts and eurozone bailouts voted for by the centre-right coalition government.

According to the most recent poll by Stern and RTL, Merkel's party, the CDU, would get only 30 per cent of the vote.

Merkel has to face not only a furious electorate, but also the German constitutional court might, which well still rule the eurozone bailout is illegal as well as an increasingly eurosceptic press.

The German public is furious that taxpayers are being dragooned by Merkel's government into spending hundreds of billions of euros to support banks via the trillion-euro Greek and eurozone bailouts.

They are furious at „austerity cuts“ that could see Germans being forced to clean streets in a Nazi-style work creation measure floated by the Employment Minister Ursula von der Leyen.

They are furious that an EU treaty which forbids a “transfer union” is being trampled on by the Bilderberg Merkel government to force the Germans to provide almost limitless financial support for banks such as Deutsche Bank that hold sovereign debt of Greece and other countries.

They are furious that banks that have created the problems are not going into default, but are being allowed to drain the economy thanks to their friends in government.

The Germans are also angry that the ECB has violated every rule to start buying up souvereign debts on the secondary debt market for the profit of the banks, so increasing the money supply and risking inflation.

A recent poll showed that 64% of the Germans want a return to the D Mark.

The D Mark was abolished without securing the consent of the German people in another action rammed down by Bilderberg politicians.

The introduction of the euro has resulted in a huge drop in living standards for Germans over the past few years, and no amount of dubious statistics from the OECD can hide this very evident fact.

The Merkel government has run up gigantic national debts to give the banks big bailouts while keeping wages low and depressing domestic demand.

The only beneficiaries of the euro have been a small group of corporations that export weapons etc.

The Bilderbergs know they cannot go on without winning over German public opinion - or starting a war.

And Horst Koheler, the suave communicator, played a vital role in wooing the public. A former IMF director chosen by Merkel, Koehler knew the „monster“ of the financial markets and called for regulation, but he nevertheless signed every bill that has helped plunge Germany into such a crisis, including the eurozone bailout bills.

Shortly before signing the 720 billion euro bailout bill, Koheler started on a tour of China between 17th and 22 May, hanging on a visit to Afghanistan.

In a radio interview recorded in Afghanistan, Köhler escalated the war rhetoric and said that German people should be ready to send out troops to protect corporate interests.

Ever since the federal republic of Germany was founded in 1949 after its Nazis leaders -- sponsored by industrialists and bankers -- embarked on barbaric and wasteful war, the German people have rejected military force unless it is to “defend Germany and its citizens from political blackmail and external danger”, as stated in the constitution.

The German armed forces are in Afghanistan to make profits for German arms dealers and ensure the Bilderbergs can harvest a bigger heroin crop in Afghanistan, and the war is deeply unpopular in Germany.

German soldiers signalled to Koehler during his visit that they are doubtful about the potential for stabilising the situation in Afghanistan because the German soldiers realise – just like the US and UK troops – that the aim of the cartel is perpetual war for the profit of corporations.

Koehler’s remarks in Afghanistan were picked up by a blogger and circulated widely, eventually being published in the mainstream media, and they drew strong criticism from the public.

To the Bilderbergs, Mr Köhler's statement could not have come at a worse time.

The emotional German debate has blown up just at the moment when the coalition government and Köhler appear to be preparing to announce at the Bilderberg’s behest an escalation of the war in Afghanistan, and possibly a greater involvement in  strike against Iran.

Koehler was left alone to face the criticism and had a foretaste of the backlash if and when the Iran war is delcared for the economic interests of the Bilderbergs.

But Köhler's also remarks meant that a declaration of world war three by him would have no credibilty among the German public, and so his resignation must have come as a relief to the Bilderbergs too.

The search for a new candidate „acceptible to everyone“ has already begun and Ursula von der Leyen is being tipped as the new president, who has to be nominated in 30 days.

But it is doubtful that von der Leyen, who has all the charm and brains of Eva Braun, will command the kind of respect that Koehler was able to.

The next step, war with Iran must be sold to the sceptical German public as a security need and Germans will hardly be ready to die in their millions so that the likes of Merkel, von der Leyen, Schaüble and Guttenberg can make some profits. 

Merkel is trying to make the best of Koehler’s resignation to reshuffle the coalition and give it a new lease of life, selling the drastic budget cuts as "clever saving".

But the loss of the very made Merkel made president just one year into his second term could also signal the end of the increasingly unpopular coalition.

As the Bilderberg’s gather in Spain between June 4th and 7th, they will be having to do some crisis management of their own as their personnel desert them and their plans fall apart.

They will have to do this under unprecedented scrutiny and knowing that a war with Iran and the destruction of the euro for their profit could well create a public reaction in Germany and other eurozone countries that could end their rule forever.

In the USA, in the meantime, the Gulf oil spill engineered by BP is also resulting in the widespread recognition that these people are so damaging that they have to be removed from power soon.

The Bilderberg meeting in Sitges could even turn out to be the last such one ever.

Original Source - http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3620%3Abilderbergs-plunged-into-crisis-by-resignation-of-german-president&catid=41%3Ahighlighted-news&Itemid=105&lang=en