The Chilcot inquiry into whether former Prime Minister Tony Blair systematically distorted the evidence to exaggerate the threat that Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction posed in order to justify a war has barely begun. And yet, key national and international government officials appear to be at work to plunge the world into another war with Iran by falsifying the evidence of a nuclear threat.

The new chief of the IAEA, the UN’s nuclear watchdog in Vienna, has just issued a tough report about Iran’s nuclear weapon’s capability.

His assessment of the threat Iran’s nuclear weapons is in sharp contrast with the previous head of the IAEA, Mohammed El Baradei as well as the CIA. These concluded Iran’s nuclear programme was for peaceful reasons mainly and posed little threat to the world.

Iran also has no effective, long range missile delivery system for nuclear warheads.

However, the new UN chief, barely in his post, has taken a very different view, ratcheting up the threat posed by Iraq, though it is not clear on the basis of what evidence.

Indeed, it appears facts are once more being massaged to justify a rush to war – and boost the profits of the banking, oil, military industrial complex.

Reminiscent of the murder of weapon’s expert David Kelly, Timothy Hampton, a

British nuclear expert monitoring nuclear activity fell from the 17th floor of a United Nations building in November.

Doctors concluded from a second post-mortem examination that he may have been hurled to his death. even though the police initially declared the death to be a “suicide”.

It cannot be ruled out that Hampton, like Kelly, had evidence to show that Iran was not a threat in alignment with an earlier CIA assessment, and was eliminated because his opinion was an obstacle to a war desired by key people.

A war with Iran would have significant implications for the EU now that the Lisbon Treaty has come into force.

A solidarity clause compels all EU national governments to align themselves with any decision by the EU foreign minister, Catherine Ashton, to go to war.

In addition, mass conscription is possible under the Lisbon Treaty. This Treaty also creates an EU army.

The activities of newly appointed EU President Herman van Rompuy and foreign minister Catherine Ashton show that key positions for foreign policy are already being taken over ina coup d’etat by a clique that appear to be pushing forward the agenda of the banksters pressing for global government and population reduction through vaccinations, financial crisis and wars to create a  “New World Order.”

Without consultation, Ashton has just appointed an EU ambassador to Washington, a key position in any eventual US-EU declaration of war against Iran. Furthermore, Rompuy has unilaterially declared himself the leader in G20 talks without receiving permission to do so.

In addition, the EU has set up its own secret service to prepare intelligence reports for diplomats, opening the spectre of a “sexed up” Iran war dossier to justify a war against Iran.

A false flag “terrorist” operation on European soil – perhaps in connection with a minaret referendum planned by the Austrian far right party or on some other pretext – could be magnified by the controlled corporate media to whip up war hysteria.

 This pattern of false flag attacks and „sexed up“ dossiers led to the war in Afghanistan and Iraq – and we must stop this happening again.

If a war breaks out in Iran, it could result in world war three.

In the meantime, it is clear the World Trade Center collapsed on September 9, 2001, not because of the impact hijacked plans but because of a demolition.

It is also clear that the corporate media, as well as media bodies such as the BBC, have conspired to mislead the general public about the sound scientific evidence that conclusively proves that the WTC cannot have falled into their footprints in a matter of seconds unless they had been destroyed by explosives from within.

Yet, this fictitious plane alleged attack was used to launch the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. These wars have cost millions of lives but they have also led to gigantic profits for the military-industrial complex as well as for the banks in the form of increased government debt and oil companies.

Instead of rushing into world war three, we should launch adequate inquiries and put the people responsible for this fraud in goal.